Re: What's appropriate mate

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Cameron Laird: ""Folk anthropology" (was: Anthropology ?) [LONG]"
• Previous message: Ruby Rohrlich: "Re: Sexual dimoprhism in human brain..."

On Mon, 20 Feb 1995, Anthro Students wrote:

> Reply to: RE>>What's appropriate material...
>
>
>
> Aaah. Surrounded by pedants. Why did everyone focus on the "America" problem
> in Ruby R's post and completely ignore the larger issue of US'centrism in the
> net (and anthro-l). As came out in Danny Yee's post it's real and it's there.
> There is in fact quite a lot of grumbling amongst the backwood networks about
> this side of the net. So before you decide to pull out the US constitution as
> the clincher to the next debate... tell someone who cares.
>
> Regards
>
> John Cook....
>
What are you talking about? Backwood networks? U.S. centrism in the
anthro-l (and net). I haven't heard of this before, really.

who are you to decide who cares or not? Welcome to higher education
where we learn to separate between personal rhetoric and argument. If
you have a point, make it. Don't shovel some sophomoric attempt
at condescending sarcasm.

• Next message: Cameron Laird: ""Folk anthropology" (was: Anthropology ?) [LONG]"
• Previous message: Ruby Rohrlich: "Re: Sexual dimoprhism in human brain..."