ANTHRO-L Digest - 14 Feb 1994 to

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John O'Brien: "Ethnomethodology and anthropology"
• Previous message: Stan Yoder: "Re[2]: ethnomethodology"

Karla Poewe is on to a good question. How does Radcliffe-Brown, and British
structural-functionalism generally, connect to what is a Weberian descendecy
in ethnomethodology? If there is a connection, historical or otherwise, I'm
very interested to know. It seems Karla is right that it is more cultural or
interpretive anthropology than social anthro (Garfinkel and Geertz do have a
common intellectual ancestor in Parsons).

• Next message: John O'Brien: "Ethnomethodology and anthropology"
• Previous message: Stan Yoder: "Re[2]: ethnomethodology"