Re: MO BETTER poMO

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Hugh Jarvis: "1988 symposium on Northern Pacific cultures"
• Previous message: Kathleen G Williamson: "Re: MO BETTER poMO"

} Status: OR
}
} I suggest we use *pomo*, but that it mean *post-MODEMism*. isn't that more
} descriptive of where we are at in this MOment? hmm, how bout pomo =
} *postMOMENTism*? just an afterthought. hah heh heh ha
} I personally look forward to an era in which we now longer use the
} heteronormative gaze, perhaps we could call that *pohomo*
Shouldn't the current be "MODEMism"? I haven't the faintast idea
what would constitute "post-modemism" then. ;-)


--
Brad M. Biglow
Department of Anthropology
PO Box 15200
Northern Arizona University
Flagstaff, AZ 86011

bmb@sunset.cse.nau.edu , bmb@ghost.cse.nau.edu
bbiglow@nyx.cs.du.edu , bbiglow@nyx10.cs.du.edu
bmb@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu

• Next message: Hugh Jarvis: "1988 symposium on Northern Pacific cultures"
• Previous message: Kathleen G Williamson: "Re: MO BETTER poMO"