Re: Science and religion

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Nicholas Gessler: "Re: Have you evolved?"
• Previous message: Tibor Benke: "Re: Altruism"
• Maybe in reply to: Ronald Kephart: "Science and religion"

Ronald Kephart wrote:
>
> May I offer a friendly amendment? Take out the "true" thing, so that the
> definition reads "If it cannot be proved false, it is religion; if it can, it is
> science."

Yes, yes, yes, quite true! *I* knew what I was thinking, however, that turned
out to be slightly different than what I typed. Oops.

Chuck

• Next message: Nicholas Gessler: "Re: Have you evolved?"
• Previous message: Tibor Benke: "Re: Altruism"
• Maybe in reply to: Ronald Kephart: "Science and religion"