Re: Political Sci/Social Sci Term Paper Ideas Available
na716472@anon.penet.fi
Sun, 15 Sep 1996 09:01:19 -0500
In article <Paul.Bernhardt-1409962110490001@news.cc.utah.edu>,
Paul.Bernhardt@m.cc.utah.edu (Paul Bernhardt) wrote:
> In article <na716472-1409960929580001@nyc-ny12-06.ix.netcom.com>,
> na716472@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>
>
> > Women who have been caught up in feminism not only have contributed
> > to declining standards in the work world including the standards of
> > verisimilitude and ethics, but their lack of a traditional homelife
> > has also contributed to a lower white birth rate which is less than
> > the replacement rate, thereby contributing to the extinction of the
> > white race.
Paul Bernhardt wrote:
> Wow!!! No wonder this person posts from a pseudo-anonymous address (we all
> know that anon.penet.fi is out of business for about a month now). It is
> all a jargon laced pseudosophisticated argument that supports racist and
> misogynist tripe.
>
> Translation of the above for those not inclined to wade through it:
> Feminism increases lying and low ethical standards. Feminism makes white
> women have fewer babies. This means that the white race is in danger of
> disappearing off the face of the earth. Amazing and faulty.
The Author responds:
Faulty?? Not in the least. Read on.
Paul Bernhardt wrote:
> There are large numbers of Black, Hispanic, Asian, et al. feminists,
> possibly more as a percentage of each racial group than of Whites. If
> feminism decreases birth rates, shouldn't the birth rates of these groups
> be similarly affected? Or is he/she arguing that Whites are differentially
> affected by feminism so that it makes the white race liable to extinction?
> If that is his arguement it clearly implies that whites have weaker powers
> of reasoning and can't understand the dangers of feminism. His/her
> reasoning is faulty for sure.
The Author responds:
In the downward equalization spiral precipitated by government
enforced equality, who has the most to lose and the farthest trip
downward? Answer: the white male, and secondly, the white female.
Other minorities are being downwardly equalized, too, but since
they started in a relatively low position, in many cases equal-
ization hardly makes a dent in their way of life. Whites are not
necessarily weak when it comes to reasoning. They are just too
nice and naive when it comes to dealing with alien forces that
are out to do them in. You know the old saying: "Nice guys finish
last!"
Regarding equal employment rights for females in Japan: the law
has not been in effect long enough, and the enforcement has not
been strong enough for the consequences of the law to start
rearing their ugly heads.
Paul Bernhardt wrote:
> Go away silly racist person. All your pseudosophisticated arguements are
> just hot air. If there is anything to your thesis, get it published
> yourself. Why offer it to others? You are a silly, very silly, small
> minded person.
The Author responds:
Your suggestions and comments are being given the highest
consideration, and you can be assured that they will be acted
upon in the most appropriate manner.
If anyone would like a free email copy of the multipart
treatise on the downward wage equalizing effects of
equal employment opportunity, send a brief request to:
na716472@anon.penet.fi Hurry while the penet remailer
is still forwarding email to the "na" form of addresses!
"Government enforced wage equalization will work only in the
downward direction" - despite any initial appearance to the
contrary! And believe it or not, the least preferred job
candidate doesn't even have to be awarded a job for many
phenomena to take place!
|