Re: Adaptationism again

Bryant (
12 Sep 1996 12:13:31 -0600

In article <518a0m$>, Paul Gallagher <> wrote:
>In <> Stephen Barnard <> writes:
>>- Straw-man argumentation.
>No. Don't believe everything Dawkins tells you.
>Is Dawkins becoming the new Ayn Rand? All these little Dawkins-ites
>so sure they know everything!

What makes you so sure that everybody who agrees with
Dawkins on some points is a Dawkin-ite? Or is that just another example
of the "label and denounce by association with that label" strategy y'all
are so fond of in these parts?

How about dealing with some substantive arguments?