Re: Creationists win the schools in New Mexico

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Evolution, "adaptation", and what's currently adaptive"
• Previous message: Matt Beckwith: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"

In article <322768AD.1014@madison.tec.wi.us>,
George Cooper <gwc2406@madison.tec.wi.us> wrote:
>
>I don't see how any evolutionist could object to this.

It's not about evolutionism per se, George. It's about standards of
evidence and the scientific method. Any scientist familiar with the
relevant evidence has concluded that creationism is not science. It does
not posit falsifiable/testable predictions, for starters.

>States should not
>mandate what shall be taught in a science classroom, right?

Wrong. States should not mandate that non-scientific topics be taught *as
science*. No scientist I know would object to the teaching of various
creation stories in a non-science class, on say religion or philosophy.

>Are you pro-choice or not?

Sure. What's that got to do with it? :)

>GC

Bryant

• Next message: Bryant: "Re: Evolution, "adaptation", and what's currently adaptive"
• Previous message: Matt Beckwith: "Re: how many bastards are there, anyway?"