Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?

Erik Max Francis (
Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:42:05 PDT (Wesley Taylor) writes:

> You might try to read outside astronomy a little. Hannes Alfvens work in
> Plasma Physics has done some real damage to Big Bang. The BB theory is NOT
> almost universally accepted. There are some steady staters left and a whole
> new crop of plasma cosmology theorists. Try Lerners "The Big Bang Never
> Happened " as a start. He gives an excellent descripton of teh alternates
> and the problems in publishing challenges to big bang.

No, the big bang _is_ still almost universally accepted, despite a few
groups waiting in the wings. Despite what others would have you believe,
the big bang still is by far and away the best cosmological model we

Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE // uuwest!alcyone!max,
San Jose, CA, USA // 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W // GIGO, Omega, Psi // the 4th R!
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- // 1love // folasade
_Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt._ // mc2? oo? Nah. //