Re: culture as gene-flow regulator: the arunta
Gerold Firl (firstname.lastname@example.org)
3 Oct 1996 20:03:00 GMT
In article <56cUyUjRQoZP092yn@netcom.com>, email@example.com (Stan Koper) writes:
|> I guess I must have missed most of this thread, but when Mervyn
|> Meggitt was lecturing in the 60's at the University of Michigan,
|> he stated quite clearly that subincision does not involve cutting
|> the urethra.
Interesting. I wish I knew my source for the the mechanics of
subincision, but this was nearly 20 years ago. As I recall, the urethra
was cut along its length, and prevented from healing shut again.
Any idea how widespread the practice of subincision was in australia?
|> The thing of it is, they were still doing it when he did his
|> field work, because all of the ladies asked his wife how she
|> could possibly have any fun having sexual intercourse with a guy
|> who *didn't* have his penis subincised.
Yes; apparently aborigine women viewed subincision as being very
desirable. The description I read implied that intercourse with a
flattened, subincised penis was simply more physically pleasurable, but
I would have to suspect that there were also cultural constructs
Disclaimer claims dat de claims claimed in dis are de claims of meself,
me, and me alone, so sue us god. I won't tell Bill & Dave if you won't.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=---- Gerold Firl @ ..hplabs!hp-sdd!geroldf