Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?
Ross Archer (email@example.com)
Thu, 21 Nov 1996 07:12:56 GMT
Bob Whitaker <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote this:
> PC has thousands of people like yo to come up with plusible attacks
>on all opposition. All tyrannies do. It is your absolutely perfect
>record of PC consistency that discredits you.
Fascinating logic. Dissecting this tangled mess of
fuzzy logic into its constituent underlying nonsense
1. "PC" (still an undefined term) equals a tyranny (which is
an oppressive form of governance.) [ Funny, there was no "PC Party"
on my ballot this November.]
2. Evidently, the plausibility of an argument has nothing to do
with its quality, logic or appeal. No, instead plausibility results
directly from the large number of people making the argument --
that's why public opinion can never shift or change away from the
majority opinion to a minority opinion, and why we all believe the
Earth to be flat and the center of the Universe to this very day.]
3. If the arguments from a lot of people are consistent with
each other, this casts doubt on the arguments. If a set of
arguments are perfectly consistent, why, then they
are impeached of credibility. [The alert reader may note that
this is exactly how science doesn't work.]
Such pure horseshit could only emerge from a pure [fill in the rest