Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?

Bob Whitaker (
Fri, 01 Nov 1996 16:21:56 -0500

I think I€ll do what you guys do, and just repeat other€s remarks. I€ll
just repeat mine.
You clones are, as always unanimously, the only ones who think you
can fool people into thinking you are not demanding immigration and
integration for all white majority countries, and only for white
majority countries.
What I am saying is know to all. Kasiecki-Brown has announced that
this is no argument, but the fact is that I grant you full custody of
anybody who doesn€t know these things.
Any clown who doubts people are in prison under European Hate Laws
because I don€t name their names , like Kasiecki-Brown, is your kind of
moron, and you€re welcome to them. You are also more than welcome to
the morons who are willing to believe that race isn€t really there.
You try to increase your apparent numbers by singing in chorus, but I
have been in serious politics too long to be fooled. The left-wing
noise is always loud and well-coordinated, but in real politics, they
get no following.
There are some of you who really do believe this Politically Correct
crap, but you are few and you are hopeless.
Meanwhile, I will continue to address my remarks to people who reside
out here in reality.

Dene Bebbington wrote:
> Bob Whitaker <> wrote:
> >Thomas Yu wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <555rct$>,
> >> Gerold Firl <> wrote:
> >> >In article <553ake$>, Ron Kephart
> ><> writes:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >If you choose to willfully deny the existance of race in humans, then
> >> >you will compromise your ability to understand how we got to be where
> >> >we are. Of course, the political benefits of such denial may make it
> >> >worth your while; you'll have to be the judge of that.
> >>
> >> Many race deniers claim that race can not be classified do
> >> to it's anologue distribution. Which means the NAZI racialist
> >> must agree on an absolute definition of what being white is.
> >>
> >> The best and the most solid definition of a white person is
> >> some one who can not tan. No matter how long they lay out in the
> >> sun, they just turn red, and their skins peal off and they become
> >> white again. Thus this is where the term "red neck" came from.
> >>
> >> With this definition, we have an absolute dividing line between
> >> where one race ends, and another race begins.
> >> If you can NOT tan what so ever, then you are part of the white
> >> race.
> >> If you can tan, then you are not part of the white race.
> >> You are most likely a "Mongolian rape trash", or
> >> an "Arabic rape trash".
> >>
> >> Are all you Aryans willing to agree on this definition?
> >> If not, you are trying to blurr the racial lines again,
> >> which is just the amo that the race denyiers need to claim that
> >> race doesn't exist.
> >
> >
> > Yu is being a good racist. After all, no one is demanding
> >immigration into Asia or racial balance there.
> So?
> > He and his ilk are
> >demanding massive immigration and racial balance only into white
> >majority countries: each and every white majority country, no
> >exceptions, and nothing but white majority countries.
> Hmmm, come on Bob, let's see the evidence that he has demanded
> immigration into each and every white majority country, and nothing but
> white majority countries.
> > What he calls
> >white racism means that there will still be white majority countries in
> >the future.
> > In Yu's ideal world, Asia will be Asian, Africa black, and all white
> >majority countries brown.
> Where has he said that, come on Bob, one thing some of us will demand is
> that you provide evidence to back up your assertions.
> --
> Dene Bebbington
> "... after all, who'd notice another madman around here?!"