Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

David Tonhofer (
29 May 1995 17:36:05 +0200

In article <>,
Gil Hardwick <> babbles, in response to some
posting (NOT by Gil Hardwick):

>None of this nonsense is of any relevance to anthropology in any way
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>whatsoever, and I can only suppose that you include us in your cross
^^ ^^^^^
>posts merely to amuse yourself watching everyone else out here weary
>of your continuing stupidity.


That's great, Gilly boy. This interesting and well-worded flame applies
so well to your own puke^H^H^H^Hpostings that I wonder whether you might not
have a good dose of self-irony after all.

Or are you affiliated to alt.syntax.tactical?

-- David