Re: Setting Followups (was Re: ZERO (was: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")
Gil Hardwick (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sat, 27 May 1995 01:46:56 GMT
In article <USER.31.2FC598BC@med.monash.edu.au>, Ian Musgrave (USER@med.monash.edu.au) writes:
>So could I ask EVERYONE again, including gil, old sweetheart, to _please_
>check their headers when replying to a post to ensure that it goes to the
Ah, but you continue to lack any credibility since persisting so in
NAMING me in particular. Why?
Ian, greetings and salutations, have I got your attention finally?
Knock knock! Anybody home?
I am not the God of the Internet! I am but a humble user like everyone
else. So if you don't mind, as you succeed in having everybody at once
follow your advice (and Good Luck!), I am quite happy to go along with
EXCEPT, when some crud moron decides to cross-post their abuse so
widely, THEN I will assert my right of reply to the same audience.
In that case, please do speak to them about their behaviour FIRST,
before I get a chance to intervene.
Get it yet?