Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"Kai Henningsen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
14 May 1995 18:34:00 +0100
email@example.com wrote on 05.05.95 in <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Phil A. Willems (email@example.com) wrote:
Well, I don't know what he's up to either, except if it's starting flame
Some of his posts look like obvious trolls meant to get the discussion off
Others seem like stupid but earnest attacks on astronomy from an
However, while I can't conclude what Gil's trying to do, it is obvious to
What an arrogant, stupid moron.
Which is a rather lengthy way to say *PLONK*.