Re: These guard dogs (Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory")

Eric Shook (Panopticon@oubliette.COM)
Mon, 8 May 95 02:16:57 CST

In article <3oi1pl$> carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Carl J Lydick) writes:

> Why, you ARE too stupid to understand, Gil. I was referring to your claim that
> What that is, Gil, is that you must apply your own moronic bullshit to
> yoursrelf. You are, unfortunately, demonstrably too stupid to understand that.
> confine your bullshit to the anthropology newsgroup, instead of inflicting your
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
> ignorance on such groups as sci.astro? Or are you too stupid to learn how to
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
> use your newsreader?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl, could you be more explicit? I'm having a hard time understanding
whatever it is you are trying to say. I know that you mean well, but
perhaps you could give it another try. Do you think that maybe a _few more_
of your cleverly inserted adjectives might make it any clearer for me?

-- Eric Nelson --
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee: