Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Phil A. Willems (
7 May 1995 19:26:04 GMT

In article <>,
Gil Hardwick <> wrote:
>In article <3nud0o$>, Phil A. Willems ( writes:
>> Nothing exists without an underlying set of assumptions
>>which are untestable. But to continually draw attention to that
>>fact is boring, leads nowhere, and ignores important differences
>>between opposing viewpoints.
>Look, get clear finally will you? Whatever exists exists without
>humans being around to construct their assumptions, testable or

Give it up, Gil. Reposting my older contributions and
pretending that I am obstinately repeating myself is nothing more
than building a straw man.