Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
2 May 1995 10:47:10 GMT

In article <>, (Gil Hardwick) writes:
=In article <3nq7ef$>, Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:
=>No, Gil. The hypothesis described above is quite distinct from the tired light
=>hypothesis. Once again, you demonstrate your abysmal ignorance.
=Ignorance of what, Carl? VAX/VMS, or your "tired light hypothesis"?

Based on every post I've ever seen from you, Gil, I'd say you're abysmally
ignorant of damned near everything.

=We are not physicists. We have no access to your data.

Gee. Anthropologists are all too stupid to use a library, eh? I'm sure your
fel;low anthropologists will be glad to hear you claiming that.

Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.