Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Hilary Tombaugh (hilary@gladstone.uoregon.edu)
Thu, 20 Apr 1995 01:16:43 -0700

On 18 Apr 1995, Richard Ottolini wrote:

> The existance of a creator is irrelevant to the big bang theory itself,
> for it is unnecessary for explaining the observations.
>
Yes! I have often thought, that science and religion are not necessarily
opposed. Science observes a proccess, and postulates the mechanics of
it. Religion offeres an answer to the why that haunts the human soul...