Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: James Borrett: "Re: Proper Gander"
• Previous message: hegeman@wchat.on.ca: "Re: the mind of culture: tops-down or bottoms-up?"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH"
• Next in thread: Paul Smith: "Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH"

mwcitech@atl.mindspring.com wrote:
>
> Magic, simply put, is self help. Whenever magic deviates from this norm
> it becomes destructive. Therefore positive magic is helpful and negative
> magic is destructive.

MUCH DRIVEL SNIPPED.

> Anyone interested in learning more about the world of magic (the world
> between worlds) may send an email stating their desires.

There are plenty of discussion groups for this topic, including
alt.magick, alt.pagan, alt.religion.wicca, etc. Please take
the subject matter there, and leave these groups alone.

Kiwi Carlisle

• Next message: James Borrett: "Re: Proper Gander"
• Previous message: hegeman@wchat.on.ca: "Re: the mind of culture: tops-down or bottoms-up?"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH"
• Next in thread: Paul Smith: "Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH"