Re: Did Lucy have human-like feet?
Thomas Swanson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
8 Jul 1996 16:11:26 GMT
In article <31DF49FD.5B08@fast.net> "A. Pagano" <email@example.com> writes:
>The following is posted on behalf of David Buckna <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>On 27 Jun 1996 email@example.com (Christopher C. Wood) wrote:
>>No. What evidence do you have that K-Ar dating method is in serious
>>error? Can you point to other efforts to assign an age to the strata
>>that suggests a different age? Otherwise, you are simply ignoring
>>evidence that disagrees with your preconceived bias.
>In the article,"The Dating Gap" Marvin L. Lubenow writes:
[gap in dating available between C-14 and K-Ar]
Sorry to delete the quoted text, but my newsreader requires that the included
text exceed quoted text.
The Lubenow material states that we can't date thing accurately in a
certain window. Too old for C-14, too young for K-Ar. It doesn't
address the *validity* of dating at all. Try again.
Tom Swanson | "I have a cunning plan that cannot fail"
TRIUMF | S Baldrick
><DARWIN> "Your grasp of science lacks opposable thumbs."
L L B Waggoner