Re: Evolution Conclusively Disproved

Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
16 Feb 1995 04:06:22 GMT

In article <3hh10o$>, (Derek Abbott) writes:
=:=Hee, hee, hee. Good troll. Everybody fell for it.
=:Ah, yes. The mark of the sophomoric newbie. Had you been around for a few
=:years, you'd realize that Derek actually believe the bullshit he posts. You
=:missed, for example, the thread where he claimed that pi is a random number
=:(and spent two months trying to defend that claim). Sorry, Derek IS,
=:apparently, the moron he appears to be.
=The newbie's have probably guessed that Carl loves to judge people by his own
=standards. He's the king pin of projection.

Well, Derek, I judge people by whether they post accurate information or pure
bullshit. I've yet to see you post anything except bullshit.

=Also it doesn't seem as if he has ever experienced being on a debating team
=otherwise he would understand more about taking different positions and having
=a bit of fun with it.

Yup. One standard practice on debating teams, and one which Derek has quite
obviously adopted wholeheartedly is, when you know you're debating a lost
cause, make up some imaginary sources and bogus arguments, and hope that the
opposing team won't challenge any of them. Derek doesn't seem to like the fact
that his bullshit is generally challenged when he posts it to sci.skeptic.

Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.