Re: IQ AND RACE. The taboo subject.
14 Feb 1995 18:52:17 -0500
In article <D3uMMI.F9o@eskimo.com>, Stephen Lajoie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>In article <email@example.com>, Scatman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>In article <D3qqE8.email@example.com>, Stephen Lajoie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>I was going to post something here, but, seeing that I was communicating
>with someone called "Scatman", with an account name "taco", and there was
>nothing but unsupported assertions anyway, I thought better of it.
>Steve La Joie
Scatman is an account name I chose to replace my real name, since
I have it in my .sig. Since you can't read, my name is Charles Michael
Quezzaire-Belle. Unsupported assertions I made are only backed up by the
Library of Congress, which I used for gathering field research in the
area of Engineering subdivisions last summer. Specifically the Naval
Research Laboratory. If you didn't notice--I was challenging you. Find
us the evidence that establishes FIRMLY the genetic deviations that
define raceial subdivisions, and your argument won't fall flat on its face.
See? here's my .sig again.
/ Michael Quezzaire-Belle | "How can this weapon called INTELLIGENCE /
/ email@example.com | even compare to the hand of /
/////////////////////////////| WISDOM that shall wield it?" /