Re: HA! Re: Interesting contradiction in Genesis...
Phil Nicholls (email@example.com)
13 Feb 1995 23:42:49 GMT
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Chris Woodward (PSY) <email@example.com.> wrote:
>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com writes:
>>firstname.lastname@example.org (Dexter Wm. Francis) wrote:
>>>You boys are being way to litteral here.
>>Whew! If they had been too littoral, Phil Nicholls would have jumped on them
>>about the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis.
>Once again, Paul proves to be a deep thinker. He's always concerned with
>current events, and is always ready to tell us when the tide has turned
>and a new wave of discoveries is coming. I sea, also, that you mention
>_Australopithecus backstrokarium_ ...
Just thought I would "wade" in at this point.
That would be _Homo backstrokensis_.
But then you weren't expecting the Spanish Inquisition, I guess.
[pause while Monty Python fans wake up.]
>[ Chris Woodard, M.A. ]
>[ Anheuser-Busch Chair of Computational Theology ]
>[ University of Ediacara ]
>[ "Open-mindedness is not synonymous with blind gullibility." ]
Philip "Chris" Nicholls Department of Anthropology
Institute for Hydrohominoid Studies SUNY Albany
University of Ediacara email@example.com