|
|
Re: Bogart: Haggis crossed the Bering Strait?Don Judy (hsaller@epix.net)Tue, 17 Dec 96 11:08:25 -05
> Path: news1.epix.net!news4.epix.net!cdc2.cdc.net!news.texas.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!chi-news.cic.net!news.uiowa.edu!red.weeg.uiowa.edu!rejohnsn > From: rejohnsn@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu > Newsgroups: alt.archaeology,sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology,sci.anthropology.paleo > Subject: Re: Bogart: Haggis crossed the Bering Strait? > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 12:39:52 -0600 > Organization: The University of Iowa > Lines: 16 > Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.961216123521.44258B-100000@red.weeg.uiowa.edu> > References: <57mi8g$5a6@news.ptd.net> <57ten5$hcf@news.alaska.edu> > <OCp9eCAuQxoyEwgk@vineries.demon.co.uk> <582pjg$qiu@ash.ridgecrest.ca.us> > <bogart-0612961045190001@138.49.130.241> <9R0sy0O5IA8V091yn@teleport.com> > NNTP-Posting-Host: red.weeg.uiowa.edu > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > X-Sender: rejohnsn@red.weeg.uiowa.edu > In-Reply-To: <9R0sy0O5IA8V091yn@teleport.com> > Xref: news1.epix.net alt.archaeology:9946 sci.archaeology:57556 sci.anthropology:29274 sci.anthropology.paleo:15382 > > On Sat, 14 Dec 1996, Larry Caldwell wrote: > > > Ach, Robbie, the Archaeology of the Haggis being in the sad state that it is, > > Question is, would archaeohaggal analyses fall under the purview of > faunal analysts? Personally, I think the analysis of archaeohaggises > should belong to the coprolysts. > > Cheers, > Rebecca Lynn "HA HA! I ain't got no exams this term!" Johnson > Ph.D. stud., Dept. of Anthropology, U Iowa > > > Hatrack ratcatcher to port weapons...brickbat lingerie!!
Please confine your posts to alt.archaeohaggal.lingerie where they belong!
Dimly aware
|