WHO/WHAT is Ed Conrad?

Ed Conrad (edconrad@prolog.net)
16 Dec 1996 14:20:07 GMT

EJ <ej@vortex.is> wrote:

>Greetings from Iceland

> My name is Eir€kur J€nsson (EJ), I'm from Iceland. I am very new at
>this newsgroup but I would like to know a few things
> Who/What is Ed Conrad? I mean I'm new at this newsgroup thing (just
>few days sins I came on the net, I'm figuring this out as I go along)
>But I thought anthropology was something relaited to,,,, well how should
>I put this.... ANTHROPOLOGY??????
> I don't understand!
>Would someone (not Ed Conrad) please contact me (not on the newsgroup)
>and help my understand this Newsgroup buisness. My adress is
>ps. This is my first message on the Internet :)
> Eir€kur J€nsson


I'm Ed Conrad and I figured I'd sneak right in -- and fast! -- to let
you know Who/What I am before your email gets jammed by an
excess of incoming cow manure.

Quite simply, I have discovered petrified human remains in
Carboniferous strata between coal veins. This means man undoubtedly
existed in almost our present form multi-multi-millions of years
before the earliest date presented by the evolutionary theory of our
emergence from a prehuman ancestor.

Some of my evidence can be seen by calling up
which, of course, not only proves that man had existed back then
but that other large land animals had existed as well.

This is contrary to what all of the science books ever printed have
had to say about life during the Carboniferous (a minimum opf 280
million years ago).

On the other hand, you must understand -- because it's as factual a
fact as you'll ever run into -- that not one single shred of
conclusive evidence is available to back up the scientific
establishment's contention that man's most remote ancestor was a
cat-size, monkey-like primate -- called an insectivore -- whose
presence on earth reportedly (?) can be traced no farther back than
60-65 million years ago.

My evidence indicates that man existed on earth in our present form
during a period of time that the lowly insectivore wasn't even yet a
gleam in some prehistoric amoeba's eye.

I'd like to note that the petrified human skeletal remains and
petrified soft organs which I've discovered between coal veins seem to
indicate that man was at least seven-eight feet tall, based on the
size of many of the various human remains.

The adverse hostile reaction to these coal-age petrified human fossils
is due to the fact that they seriously threaten the very founation of
the scientific establishment's totally erroneous theory of man's
origin and ancestry.

If we didn't evolve from a lowly inhuman primate, then WHERE did we
come from? THAT is the question!

Meanwhile, Eirukir, I'd like to mention that man who lived during the
time period of the coal formations apparently was at least seven feet
tall, since just about all of my human fossils seem to be larger that
that of a large adult.

I have been defending my position for some 15-16 years against a
torrent of deceipt, dishonesty, corruption and collusion perpetrated
by the highest-placed individuals and institutions in the scientific

Prior to the arrival of the Internet, the scientific establishment
always had the final say -- that I am dead wrong -- because of its
awesome power and incredible influence.

Fortunately, however, this computer age and its Instant Messages to
Everywhere has heralded a return of the Free Press.

And I've always believed that in a Free Press -- same as the message
of Christmas -- it is much better to give than to receive.

And this, I suppose, explains why my name is plastered all over this
news group.