|
|
Re: What Are the Race Deniers Denying?Bob Whitaker (bwhit@conterra.com)Mon, 09 Dec 1996 17:26:13 -0500
> > Bob Whitaker <bwhit@conterra.com> wrote: > >> : At this point, I'm thinking that it's only a matter > >> : of time before what's left of Whitaker simply comes > >> : out and identifies propositional logic as some kind > >> : of Judeo-negroid tool of white oppression. > > > > I do attack everything you worship, don't I? > > It's rather a bit of a stretch to believe that your > tiresome repetition of that delusional gumbo of your'n > constitutes an "attack," Bob. > > And "worship" is a trifle overdone (surprise, surprise). > I do confess to having a bit of a hangup on both the > notions of evidence and clarity, since I don't make > my way through the world by fantasizing about it as > you seem to wish to do. My other hangup is on being > who you say you are and cultivating that "authenticity" > thing. Something you said a while back got me thinking > about that. > > >From bwhit@conterra.com Sat Jun 1 06:39:10 PDT 1996 > >Message-ID: <4oo50f$23b@molokini.conterra.com> > > > There is one thing you said in an earlier note that I would > >like to refute, though I usually don't respong to personal > >attacks. You said I don't have the courage to say what I say > >here in print. Actually I have said it all in print. The only > >exception would be things I can't publish. I have also lied > >about my position in poltical writing a number of times. > >Others would call it stretching the truth, but I consider any > >intentional misstatemetn of fact to be a lie. > > So what sorts of things *have* you lied about in print?
Certainly I can understand taht, being a Poltiically Correct clone, you
>
|