That silly new orgasm thing

Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters (
Wed, 21 Aug 1996 23:52:13 -0400

*}> This means that, as time goes by, men are going to be more and more
*}> sexually skilled. (Assuming that there is a genetic component to sexual
*}> skill.)

*}You know what assuming does, dontcha? This might have been true had
*}non-standard gentic material deployment been developed in the way of
*}reproduction, invitro, etc. Now nearly everyone and their lesbian sister
*}can have kids.

I know there's no point bothering with those of limited mental
capabilities who are swayed by socio-biological arguments... but does it
seem to anyone that maybe if there really were this evolutionary
pressure for men to get more sexually skillful that it might have
already happened during 3 million years of hominoid evolution, and not
only have started in 1995 with a pop-science report on cervixes
distending with orgasm... or even in 1979 with in vitro human

Sorry... that's as good as men will get :-).

Yours, Lulu...

_/_/_/ THIS MESSAGE WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY: Postmodern Enterprises _/_/_/
_/_/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _/_/
_/_/ The opinions expressed here must be those of my employer... _/_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Surely you don't think that *I* believe them! _/_/
PGP 2.6 key available by finger <>