Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?
Carl J Lydick (carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU)
25 Aug 1995 16:57:29 GMT
In article <DDuD6M.Ly8@crash.cts.com>, roosen@crash.cts.com (Robert Roosen) writes:
=: the BBT (and the SST for all that) have all to do with physics,
=: so let the physicists decide what they think is a likely theory.
=
= Yes, that is my point exactly. Cosmology as an astronomical
=subject has pretty well disappeared under the onslaught of the
=physicists.
Perhaps because pure astronomy is inadequate to deal with cosmology?
= Cosmology as an anthropological topic is not even considered.
Sure it is. In mythology courses.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL
Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
|