Re: Carl Lydick needs our help

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Lee Rudolph: "Re: Why not 13 months? (Was La Systeme Metrique)"
• Previous message: kevin m. kniffin: "stat packages (which is best?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Rusty Rae: "Carl Lydick needs our help"
• Next in thread: Hugh Gibbons: "Re: Carl Lydick needs our help"

Rusty Rae <rustyra@halcyon.com> wrote:

> Several people have mentioned a dislike for Carl's sig.

> I'm feeling that it's a bit bottom heavy and could use a
>re-working. Would anyone like to try to re-write the sig and
>post it so we can vote on the best/most popular one? We could
>wrap it and put a nice bow around it and send it to JPL -- seems
>they don't have much work to do there, so they could use a little
>comic relief, eh?

> So let's help Carl and the JPL gang who spend so much time
>here, posting from gov't issue computers on gov't time. Should we
>start with the name, then the qualifications, then the sig?

> Sheila

Sheila - that's *Cal Tech* in his .sig, not JPL ... there's an
association, and it's pretty incestuous, but I don't think he's on lab
... he isn't in the JPL phone book.

Richard

• Next message: Lee Rudolph: "Re: Why not 13 months? (Was La Systeme Metrique)"
• Previous message: kevin m. kniffin: "stat packages (which is best?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Rusty Rae: "Carl Lydick needs our help"
• Next in thread: Hugh Gibbons: "Re: Carl Lydick needs our help"