Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Lane Singer: "Re: Best American Composer."
• Previous message: Benjamin Jay Britton: "Re: What is Forbidden Archeology?"

In <D77pLt.JJ7@crash.cts.com> roosen@crash.cts.com (Robert Roosen) writes:

> Definitely, interpreting the redshifts in this way led to various
>expanding universe theories, including the big bang.
> This is an example of people discovering their assumptions and
>treating them as something new.

And what are your undiscovered assumptions?

If you have a competing theory which is simpler than a Big Bang
theory, and which explains cosmological redshifts, the cosmic
background radiation (including temperature, spectrum and isotropy),
primordial elemental abundances, and for which the Sagdeev-Ze'eldovich
effect is not a problem, please describe it.

• Next message: Lane Singer: "Re: Best American Composer."
• Previous message: Benjamin Jay Britton: "Re: What is Forbidden Archeology?"