Re: Australian finds >100 000 BP?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John Waters: "Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: Bob Casanova: "Re: Creation or Evolution? You Decide :)"
• Maybe in reply to: Howard Wiseman: "Australian finds >100 000 BP?"

On 24 Sep 1996 01:27:12 -0400, promethius@aol.com (Promethius) wrote:

> I just read a short article on this very subject in yesterdays paper
>and as a student of modern human origins I found it terribly interesting.
>The article was, however, rather short on detail. I must admit I find it
>comforting to know that these kinds of finds must make supporters of the
>"Out of Africa" hypothesis itch something fierce. However, having not
>seen any sort of official report and not having relevant data to examine,
>I personally must regard the report with a certain degree of caution.

Even more important in my mind, is that it makes those who think H.Erectus,
H.Neanderthalis, etc. to be another species from H.Sapiens itch like poison
ivy.

Yousuf Khan

--

Yousuf J. Khan

ykhan@achilles.net

Ottawa, Ont, Canada

Nation's capital

• Next message: John Waters: "Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: Bob Casanova: "Re: Creation or Evolution? You Decide :)"
• Maybe in reply to: Howard Wiseman: "Australian finds >100 000 BP?"