Re: Savanna: a slow demise

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Richard Foy: "Re: elaine's questions"
• Previous message: Tom Clarke: "Webbed Foot in South Africa?"
• Maybe in reply to: Elaine Morgan: "Savanna: a slow demise"
• Next in thread: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Savanna: a slow demise"

In article <630996483wnr@desco.demon.co.uk>,
Elaine Morgan <Elaine@desco.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>The savannah Theory is dead, but it did not end in the sixties, and it
>was an unconscionable time a-dying. Even up to less than a year ago,
>though the song may have ended, the melody lingered on.

I am mostly a lurker here. However, is a brief summary of the
currently "scientifically correct" theory available somewhere on the
net.

When I first read the AAT in your book "The Descent of Woman" many
years ago it seemed to me to explain a lot more of the data than the
"savannah" theory.

-- 

"The hammer shatters glass but forges steel." --Russian proverb



rfoy@netcom.com  	 Weaving a World Wide Web

• Next message: Richard Foy: "Re: elaine's questions"
• Previous message: Tom Clarke: "Webbed Foot in South Africa?"
• Maybe in reply to: Elaine Morgan: "Savanna: a slow demise"
• Next in thread: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Savanna: a slow demise"