Re: AAT TheoryH. M. Hubey (email@example.com)
4 Sep 1995 20:53:15 -0400
sandee@Think.COM (Daan Sandee) writes:
>The AAT is based on the fossil gap - no fossil gap, no AAT. New finds are
OK. So we have at least one reason we can nibble on. [We can discuss
So then what is the mainstream theory's explication of the
Where did they go?
>On the other hand, fossils *supporting* the AAT are unlikely to turn up.
What fossils would support AAT? Are we expecting digs in the ocean
HOw would AAT make dispersion of humanoids more or less easy to