Re: AAT Theory

Thomas Clarke (
17 Oct 1995 19:09:16 GMT

In article <460b7i$> chris brochu
<> writes:

> Of course that's reasonable. But, is it testable? If we stated that H.
> erectus was furless, how would we know if we were wrong?

Maybe we'll be lucky and find a volcanic ash body print someday,
like the Laetoli footprints.

Off hand I can't think of another way based on stony fossils.

Tom Clarke