Re: Hominid Family Tree

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Alex Duncan: "grasping feet"
• Previous message: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: AAT Theory"
• Maybe in reply to: William Baird: "Hominid Family Tree"
• Next in thread: Alex Duncan: "Re: Hominid Family Tree"

In article <45junt$h6d@bubba.NMSU.Edu> William Baird, wbaird@nmsu.edu
writes:

>Questions? Comments?

I like the new one much better. One small point. As currently known, H.
habilis & H. rudolfensis are coeval. It is an error to suggest that one
is a descendant of the other. It is also very much an open question
which would be the most appropriate ancestor for H. erectus.

Alex Duncan
Dept. of Anthropology
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712-1086
512-471-4206
aduncan@mail.utexas.edu

• Next message: Alex Duncan: "grasping feet"
• Previous message: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: AAT Theory"
• Maybe in reply to: William Baird: "Hominid Family Tree"
• Next in thread: Alex Duncan: "Re: Hominid Family Tree"