Re: AAT Theory

H. M. Hubey (
10 Oct 1995 23:04:47 -0400 (David L Burkhead ) writes:

>>Any reasons, using fundamentals of biological processes which
>>people like must have in abundance, for the temperature of

> It had to be something. Just like it had to be something _else_
>for dolphins, and something _else_ for dogs, and something _else_ for
>chimps, and something _else_ for camels.


Just like life had to be based on something.

So why not hydro-carbons instead of aluminum or
titanium or something, right ?

You're a very quarrelsome fellow, Burkhead. Any special reason?


Regards, Mark