Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Thomas Clarke: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Don Staples: "Re: Life explained"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"
• Next in thread: TJ: "Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"

Pls support your premise with some facts. Name some discoveries that
were surpressed and later found to be valid.

In article <55kug8$p6a@news.ptd.net>, edconrad@prolog.net says...
>
>
>alweiner@presstar.com (Alan Weiner) wrote:
>
>> Big science is big business. If somebody came out with some real
>> info that shattered a major theory, it would get out there faster
>> than the speed of light . . .
>
>to suppress it?
>I most certainly agree!
>
>

• Next message: Thomas Clarke: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Don Staples: "Re: Life explained"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"
• Next in thread: TJ: "Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"