Re: * makes hubeyH. M. Hubey (email@example.com)
27 Nov 1995 22:21:51 -0500
firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill Burnett) writes:
>>That is the direction of evolution.
>That is THE direction of evolution?
IF those are the equations for evolution of genes, and all living
Surely you don't have a problem with the general idea that what the
Or are you disagreeing with them?
Which is it?
>single randomly reproducing group of life forms with no barriers to the
That's the next step. Obviously this flow in this space is not
Any problems so far?
If we did want to model "ALL" living things in this space, obviously
Guess what these clusters represent :-)..
>If so, how did we get here so much faster than the slugs? I know,
>Does this mean you admit you don't know what the direction of evolution is?
Cheap shots again? Why?
Where did I say that I was not aware of the random/stochastic
Where did I even give a hint that I knew exactly what these
Why are you imagining things?
Is there a straw-man in your fortune cookie today?
>The dead ones are spinning in their graves at your assertions.
>I'm laughing so hard I can hardly type... Us? Apologise to you? When I start
Read above and tell me which of the dead ones are spinning in
I find the models of Kimura a match for the earlier results. YOu can
Which part is it of those results derived by those people in