Re: From AAT to Wittgenstein? Skip it!Gerrit Hanenburg (email@example.com)
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:47:54 GMT
firstname.lastname@example.org (H. M. Hubey) wrote:
>Change is neutral. Neither Evolve nor Devolve is. Easy.
Evolve and devolve are just cumulative change. Easy.
>Yes, they're just words but we should at least agree on
>On any planet on which life can evolve, there will probably
Probably allways? Between the first replicator and the "scientist" is so
>If this is true, then it is always deterministic and has
>The only thing constant in it is evolution toward this end
"evolution toward this end...",sounds like teleological determination a la
> Regards, Mark