Re: Cro-Magnon <> Human?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Simon S Yoo: "DNA and Anthropology"
• Previous message: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: bipedalism and AAH"
• Maybe in reply to: HAROLD SILVERSTEIN: "Cro-Magnon <> Human?"
• Next in thread: JShreeve: "Re: Cro-Magnon <> Human?"

In article <3oeci5$rdt@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>, SANS@ix.netcom.com (HAROLD SILVERSTEIN) writes...
>In "The Neandertals", Trinkaus and Shipman say that the first human
>fossil we have came from a man who lived 25 thousand years ago.
>Does this mean that Cro-Magnon was not human? If not, why not.
>
>Could someone direct me to some reading on this subject?
>
>Marita
There is a huge debat concerning this subject going on right now,
one side says our "species" while the other side says another species.
The classification now starts with homo-sapiens, so thats a small clue
to what the leading anthropologists agree on.?. Reading on this
particular subject can be found in any CURRENT text pertaining to
physical or paleo anthropology.

Jon Junek

• Next message: Simon S Yoo: "DNA and Anthropology"
• Previous message: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: bipedalism and AAH"
• Maybe in reply to: HAROLD SILVERSTEIN: "Cro-Magnon <> Human?"
• Next in thread: JShreeve: "Re: Cro-Magnon <> Human?"