|
|
Re: Australopithecus, Homo erectus, single species hypothesisPhil Nicholls (pn8886@csc.albany.edu)17 Feb 1995 04:54:35 GMT
Jim Foley <jimf@vangelis.FtCollins.NCR.com> wrote: >In article <3hrq6a$3qf@rebecca.albany.edu>, <cc3265@albnyvms.bitnet> >wrote: > >>In article <3hrdbh$62s@jupiter.WichitaKS.NCR.COM>, >>jimf@vangelis.FtCollins.NCR.com (Jim Foley) writes: > >>>Given that Louis Leakey et al had apparently disproved the single >>>species hypothesis 12 years previously, why were R. Leakey and Walker in >>>1976 writing as if it was still widely accepted? >>> >>>Was the 1964 evidence for different hominid species living side by side >>>not as strong as claimed? >>> > >>Personally, I think it was very strong evidence. However, you have to >>understand the field of paleoanthropology -- a very contentious group, full >>of big egos. The Single Species Hyp. was championed by some very big names >>in the field (notably Don Johanson, of "Lucy" and PBS specials fame) and >>so required quite a bit of evidence to be laid to rest. > >I can't understand this. Johanson was nobody until he made his big >finds in 1973 (knee joint), 74 (Lucy) and 75 (First Family). He (and >Taieb) published a paper in early 1976 (a few months before Leakey's >paper), in which I believe he claimed that the First Family finds were a >mixture of Homo and Australopithecus specimens (I haven't yet read this >paper). That doesn't make Johanson sound like an advocate of the single >species hypothesis. > >> C.R. Cooper >> Dept. of Anthropology >> SUNY Albany > >-- >Jim Foley (303) 223-5100 x9765 >Jim.Foley@FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM Symbios Logic, Fort Collins
Yes, but then Tim White got to Johanson and convinced him that all of the
--
|