|
|
Re: Breast Size (Was: Re: Homosexuality and genetic determinism)Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)Wed, 31 May 1995 02:06:40 GMT
In article <1995May30.115802.20675@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au>, Tim Benham (bentj93@cserve.cs.adfa.oz.au) writes: >I'm curious to know what evidence you have for this statement. Since >you refuse to admit a role for sexual selection at all, you need a >period of evolution when women's breasts got bigger and men's >preferences didn't change followed by one in which men's preferences >changed and women's breasts didn't. This seems very implausible, but I >may change my mind when I see your evidence.
I'm curious to know about this fixation on tits. Since this thread
Then we could ask what reproductive advantage there might have been in
Else, we might well ask about any body-part fetish we can possibly
I mean, why women's tits in particular? Few are in any way at all
If you want to talk about women's pussies, I'm danged if I can see
Even then, when you make love surely you don't just suck tits, or
I mean what did you marry, just a pair of tits and a fanny, or what?
On the other hand entirely, we could just as easily consider how it is
For the life of me I just can't find any data anywhere comparing the
|