How to tarnish Andrew's HALO
Ed Conrad (edconrad@sunlink.net)
Wed, 29 Jan 1997 00:13:40 GMT
Boy, is this place (talk.origins) ever going to the dogs (and cats)!
To wit:
>> Matt Silberstein <matts2@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> Not too long ago (even in net terms) we all (or almost all) bid a
>> tearful good-by to our sainted Andrew. But recently we have had
>> evidence that St. Andrew (was the Phd. a promotion or demotion for a
>> saint?) is no longer gone but has returned. He is with us again to
>> bring enlightenment and understanding. Has he gained a status above
>> saint? Is he, dare I say it, now a cat?
~~~~~~~
>> >> Stephen Guerke (sguerke@brahms.udel.edu), added his
>> >> two cents' worth:
>> >> Or doth he aspire to the most noble and exalted position known.
>> >> that which was held by the deceased canine, Janitor?
---O---
Hey, Saint Andy, when are you finally going to come clean
and admit that, with all the manicuring you did to your spiffy-looking
web page concerning your testing of my specimen
of petrified bone, you stopped short of conducting the only
comparative test that REALLY matters: comparing its cell
structure with the cell sturcture of a world-class, world-acclaimed,
world-recognized specimen of PETRIFIED BONE?
It's one sure way of tarnishing your halo.
|