|
|
Re: pseudoscience and fossilsPat Dooley (patdooley@aol.com)15 Jan 1995 21:10:49 -0500
>by the aah, as I am with most biological "just-so" stories. >However, I reached that opinion mostly through your (Phil Nicholls) >factual critiques of the aah (the recent sweat gland post was >especially good)
I would have been impressed too, if he had cited a peer-reviewed
I'd almost be impressed if could explain why 99:1
Pat D
|