Re: Are we "special"?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Thomas Clarke: "Re: Are we "special"?"
• Previous message: Barry Mennen: "Re: human brains v.s animal brains"
• Maybe in reply to: Paul Crowley: "Are we "special"?"
• Next in thread: Thomas Clarke: "Re: Are we "special"?"

In article <32A91E4E.2EE@scn.org> Phillip Bigelow <bh162@scn.org> writes:
>> >Paul Crowley <Paul@crowleyp.demon.co.uk> wrote in article

>> >> In a sense, we all know that we are "special",

>You know, Paul, you believers are in a special club of your own,
>did you know that?
>
>To illustrate my point, I am reposting a part of a post from one
>of the Internet's biggest Creationist Net-loons (who goes by the
>name of "Ed Conrad":

Oh. I had no idea.
So the word "special" is a red-flag indicating creationism?
I have already stubbed my toes on "purpose".

Do you have a list of red-flag words you could post, or
provide a pointer for words that should be avoided?

Tom Clarke

• Next message: Thomas Clarke: "Re: Are we "special"?"
• Previous message: Barry Mennen: "Re: human brains v.s animal brains"
• Maybe in reply to: Paul Crowley: "Are we "special"?"
• Next in thread: Thomas Clarke: "Re: Are we "special"?"