|
|
Re: Are we "special"?Lawrence Sayre (lsayre@en.com)8 Dec 1996 00:02:10 GMT
Dec 1996 20:16:01 GMT writes: :> :>In article <19961206151400.KAA21511@ladder01.news.aol.com> chessonp@aol.com writes: :>>In article <586ume$92p@news.cc.ucf.edu>, clarke@acme.ist.ucf.edu (Thomas :>>Clarke) writes: :> :>>>Here are three statements: :> :>>>1. Human beings are animals subject to evolution. :> :>>>2. Human beings uniquely among animals have language and culture. :> :>>>3. The evolutionary circumstances of human beings are non-special. :> :>>>It seems to me that 3 together with 1 implies that 2 is false. :> :>>> I conclude that 3 is false. :> :>>You need to work on your logic. :> :>OK. Where is the argument wrong? I am prepared to entertain the :>idea that some step is in error, but since I wrote the above, obviously, :>I do not see the error. :> :>You will have to expand upon your pithy comment if you want to convince :>me. :> :>Tom Clarke :> :>
For reasons which I assume to be foreign to your thinking, you are actually
1. Birds are animals subject to evolution.
2. Birds among animals are unique in their ability to fly.
3. The evolutionary circumstances of birds are non-special.
Using your logic: It seems that 3 together with 1 imply that 2 is false.
Therefore, I (using your logic) conclude that 3 is false.
Actually you are correct in that 3 is false in each case. Special
-----------------------------------------
lsayre@en.com <Lawrence Sayre>
|