Re: AAT reply from Elaine Morgan
Troy Kelley (email@example.com)
Wed, 28 Dec 1994 17:00:49 GMT
Subject: Re: AAT reply from Elaine Morgan
From: Phil Nicholls, firstname.lastname@example.org
Date: 28 Dec 1994 13:05:16 GMT
In article <email@example.com> Phil Nicholls,
>In article <1994Dec27.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>Troy Kelley <email@example.com> wrote:
>>So, following this logic, hunting dogs, lions, cheetahs, leapards,
>>hyenas, and a host of other carnavoirs should give birth to plumb babies
>>because they all have to follow game animals around on the savannah for
>>food. This is not the case. The fat deposits of these animals is not
>>similar to the fat deposits in man. I doubt if any of the animals I
>>listed, as newborns, could float in water the way a human baby can.
>Troy, listen very carefully:
>Lamarch = OUT
>Darwin = IN
>It's been that way for a very long time now. Organisms are a product
>of environment AND geneology. Therefore the "why don't . . ." questions
>that AAH love to ask are meaningless except as a display of the
>"pop-science" level of there understanding of evolution.
>Philip "Chris" Nicholls Department of Anthropology
>Institute for Hydrohominoid Studies SUNY Albany
>University of Ediacara firstname.lastname@example.org
Man.. you sure are a confrontational guy.
Phil... Listen carefully.. I am not talking about Lamarach I am talking
about CONVERGENT EVOLUTION.. something you continually choose to ignore,
mainly because AAT is supported by it.