Re: AAT is dogma

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "AAT QUESTIONS..."
• Previous message: Richard Spear: "Re: (no subject)"
• Maybe in reply to: alex duncan: "AAT is dogma"
• Next in thread: Elaine Morgan: "Re: AAT is dogma"

In article <4091cv$ihr@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> alex duncan
<aduncan@mail.utexas.edu> writes:

> And so, a question for proponents of the AAT: what would it take to
> falsify your hypothesis?
>

I'm not a proponent of the AAH, but howabout a foot fossel that is very
apelike, but shows more development towards bipedalism, from a geograpical
area that would not be AAH friendly? This would show bipedal development
did not take place in an AAH enviroment.

-steve (gosh, will they ever find such a fossel?)

• Next message: ann.nunn@sstar.com: "AAT QUESTIONS..."
• Previous message: Richard Spear: "Re: (no subject)"
• Maybe in reply to: alex duncan: "AAT is dogma"
• Next in thread: Elaine Morgan: "Re: AAT is dogma"