|
|
Re: Rushton, why?Paul J Brantingham (branting@GAS.UUG.ARIZONA.EDU)Sun, 30 Oct 1994 13:55:23 -0700
appeal to just considering the facts of science, there are several political reasons for studying race that he wants us to know about. The gross generalizations about "Pacific Rim countries" reveal two political features of Ruston's argument: (1) that he is concerned with the perceived economic and social threat represented by the performance of nations such as China, Japan and "even" such lowly places as Vietnam (some of these nations are economically outperforming the USA and Canada [my home country] too, hence the seriousness of the *perceived* threat); and (2) that he blindly accepts measures of teen-age pregnancy, rape and AIDS being made public by nations such as The Peoples Republic of China as if these were scientific facts free from political motivations for deflating such measures! In the first instance Rushton is showing his own political colors and, in the second, his is showing that he is not aware (dare I say naive) of the political motivations of others. Jeff Brantingham
|