|
|
Re: Hooks /Politics & perhaps science/humanismJOHN WALDMANN (j.waldmann@AUCKLAND.AC.NZ)Tue, 18 Oct 1994 01:01:25 +1200
felt the urge to "sytesize" the following: Anthropology is about stumbling on potholes in the pavement discussing the beauty of the abstract with yet another friend to be not very suprised to see the resulting fit of apoplexy, amused INDEED RELIEVED to find the bloody toed anthropologist shares a common language XX- !!#####- - - - - who left this!!# #4 00i3!!!!! The once again bipedal anthropologist asks YET another important but dumb question, "Now what was I saying/thinking a moment ago? - I know it was something abstract - ohh well, can't have been too important!- How about a beer before you show me how to opperate the gas station till?" OR MORE succintly, anthropology is the study of, STUMBLING over THE CONCRETE, DISCOVERing COMMUNICATION and the redundancy ************* of the ABSTRACT out of CONTEXT. Irelevant Aside: Coffee Consumption: what are the implications of the prescription of coffee rather than tea, cocaine, water as the drug of choice to imbibe during "ten minute breaks" (assuming academics take breaks, or are not engaged permananty on one). ************************************************** ~REgarding Jarvis & replies and Politics/ How can one omit Politics from ANY ANTHROPOLOGICAL disccussion. Aristotle divided the study of sciences into three areas: the science of technology, epistemology and phronesis (Bird 1994). These were seen by Aristotle as complimentary. Each providing the context in which the others opperated. The last Bird** translates as prudence - ie which explicitly implicates politics. I would expect as a new commer to the world of the internet to find a degree of clutter, redundancy and inappropriate material. That which is relevant, amusing, inspirational or sufficiently offensive will become part of the recognised discourse. All else is chaff, except for the individuals concerned who choose to shout into the wind. In words of the 6 year old Guatemalian I met in Antigua "En Todo es Politica!" His words are perhaps cliche, but they speak volumes. Human praxis is inherantly political: Some choose to see life this way, others choose not to, & others yet have no choice. TO communicate one must engage in politics because effective communication results from the explicit exercise and negotiation of power between individuals and their companions. Anthropologists, in my opinion, specialise analysis or the expression of power - either on behalf of our informants.. (as advocates); "the authority of "Science.." (Homo Acadamius) or as colonialists...(Project Camelot). Those who deny this are inevitably more concerned about the expression of power than analysis of it or its affects. Those that prefer analysis will in social or cultural anthropology need to incorporate ** Bird..: This is probably the correct reference. Can chech if an are interested. TOo many potholes in the concrete this week. John Waldmann University of Auckland J.waldmann.auckland.ac.nz
|